Publication Type:
- Weapon Program Background Report
Weapon Program:
- Nuclear
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Table 1: Iran's fuel cycle facilities
- Table 2: Iran’s undeclared facilities suspected of a connection to its nuclear weaponization effort
Introduction
Iran has operated a number of facilities that carry out the different steps of the nuclear fuel cycle. Because of the dual-use potential of many of these facilities – they can be used to manufacture fuel for nuclear reactors or nuclear weapons – the international community has long raised concerns that Iran could use this infrastructure and expertise to make weapons.
Between June 12 and 24, 2025, Israel acted on those concerns and carried out airstrikes against a number of Iranian nuclear facilities. On June 21, 2025, the United States joined the air campaign and struck multiple sites using heavy ground-penetrating munitions (“bunker-busting bombs”). Some details about the damage caused to Iran’s nuclear facilities have come to light, though it is unclear when the full extent of damage will be publicly known.
Before the strikes, Iran’s infrastructure included mines to extract natural uranium, mills that process uranium ore into a concentrate known as "yellowcake," and a plant that converts this yellowcake into uranium hexafluoride (UF6) gas. This gas is the feedstock for centrifuges that enrich uranium. Iran has operated several gas centrifuge plants and had accumulated thousands of kilograms of enriched uranium, which at higher levels can be used to manufacture fuel for weapons and at lower levels fuels nuclear reactors. Iran also operates reactors for the purpose of generating electricity and conducting research for medical and industrial applications.
Public knowledge of these sites is drawn largely from information published by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA). As a party to the nuclear nonproliferation treaty (NPT), Iran is obligated to declare facilities involved in its nuclear fuel cycle to the IAEA and to allow some form of inspection by the Agency. The Agency’s level of access to those sites has fluctuated over time, expanding following implementation of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) in 2016 and narrowing again from 2021 onward. Other facilities were never declared by Iran to the IAEA. In 2019, the Agency opened investigations into four such sites where military nuclear activities might have occurred: Turquzabad, Lavisan-Shian, Varamin, and Marivan. Additional sites, such as the military base at Parchin, have long been suspected of hosting nuclear weapon-related work.
By the eve of the strikes, Iranian restrictions on IAEA monitoring of its declared sites and obstruction of the Agency’s investigations into its undeclared sites had led the IAEA to conclude that it was not “in a position to provide assurance that Iran’s nuclear programme is exclusively peaceful.” IAEA inspectors are now absent from Iran following the U.S. and Israeli strikes, and it is unclear if or when they will return.
Below, Iran’s nuclear sites are divided into two tables: the declared facilities relating to its nuclear fuel cycle and undeclared facilities suspected of being connected to its nuclear weaponization effort. Each entry gives the facility’s purpose, location, and, where known, its status following the U.S. and Israeli strikes in June 2025.
Table 1: Iran's fuel cycle facilities
Facility/Site |
Purpose |
Location |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Saghand Uranium Mine |
extraction of uranium ore |
Saghand |
operational |
|
Gchine Uranium Mine |
extraction of uranium ore |
Gchine |
closed |
|
Narigan Mining and Industrial Complex |
extraction of uranium ore |
Bafq |
operational |
|
Ardakan Yellowcake Production Plant |
uranium concentrate production |
Ardakan |
operational |
|
Bandar Abbas Yellowcake Production Plant |
uranium concentrate production |
Bandar Abbas |
closed |
|
Isfahan Nuclear Technology Center (ENTC) |
Isfahan |
extensively damaged; 11 buildings and underground tunnel entrances impacted in U.S. and Israeli strikes |
|
|
Uranium Conversion Facility (UCF) |
uranium conversion |
ENTC |
heavily damaged |
|
Natural and Depleted Uranium Metal Production Facility |
production of metal from natural and depleted uranium |
ENTC; part of the UCF |
damaged; had not been operational prior to strikes |
|
Enriched Uranium Metal Processing Facility |
production of enriched uranium metal |
ENTC |
damaged; had been under construction prior to strikes |
|
Uranium Chemistry Laboratory (UCL) |
study of uranium compounds |
ENTC |
damaged |
|
Fuel Fabrication Laboratory (FFL) |
fuel pellet production |
ENTC |
damaged |
|
Enriched Uranium Powder Plant (EUPP) |
conversion of UF6 gas into oxide |
ENTC |
unknown; was operational prior to strikes |
|
Fuel Manufacturing Plant (FMP) |
fuel production for the Arak reactor and light water reactors |
ENTC |
damaged |
|
Fuel Plate Fabrication Plant (FPFP) |
fuel production for the Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) |
ENTC |
damaged |
|
Zirconium Production Plant (ZPP) |
zirconium sponge production |
ENTC |
undamaged; was operational prior to strikes |
|
Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) (30 kWt) |
reportedly for isotope production |
ENTC |
likely undamaged;[1] was operational prior to strikes |
|
Heavy Water Zero Power Reactor |
research |
ENTC |
likely undamaged;[1] was operational prior to strikes |
|
Light Water Sub-Critical Reactor (LWSCR) |
research |
ENTC |
likely undamaged;[1] was operational prior to strikes |
|
Light water research reactor (10 MWt) |
testing of nuclear fuel materials and isotope production |
ENTC |
likely undamaged;[1] was under construction prior to strikes |
|
Graphite Sub-Critical Reactor (GSCR) |
training |
ENTC |
unknown; had been decommissioned prior to strikes |
|
Isfahan centrifuge workshop |
centrifuge assembly |
ENTC |
damaged |
|
Iran Centrifuge Technology Company (TESA) Karaj Complex |
production of gas centrifuge rotor tubes and bellows |
Karaj |
heavily damaged; main manufacturing buildings destroyed |
|
Kalaye Electric Company |
gas centrifuge development and testing |
Tehran |
unknown; reportedly operational prior to strikes |
|
Natanz Uranium Enrichment Complex |
Near Natanz, Isfahan Province |
extensively damaged; above-ground facilities and electrical infrastructure destroyed; underground facilities struck with ground-penetrating munitions by the United States |
|
|
Natanz centrifuge workshop |
production of gas centrifuge rotor tubes and bellows |
Natanz Enrichment Site |
likely damaged or destroyed |
|
Iran Centrifuge Assembly Center (ICAC) |
gas centrifuge assembly |
Natanz Enrichment Site |
destroyed in 2020; rebuilding likely disrupted by strikes |
|
New Generation Centrifuge Assembly Center |
centrifuge assembly |
Natanz Enrichment Site |
likely damaged or destroyed |
|
Pilot Fuel Enrichment Plant (PFEP) |
uranium enrichment with gas centrifuges |
Natanz Enrichment Site |
severely damaged; above-ground portion destroyed; installed centrifuges likely damaged or destroyed[2] |
|
Fuel Enrichment Plant (FEP) |
uranium enrichment with gas centrifuges |
Natanz Enrichment Site |
damaged; installed centrifuges likely damaged or destroyed[2] |
|
Fordow Uranium Enrichment Site |
Near Qom |
damaged; struck with ground-penetrating munitions by the United States; access roads and entrances damaged |
|
|
Fordow Fuel Enrichment Plant (FFEP) |
uranium enrichment with gas centrifuges |
Fordow Enrichment Site |
damaged; installed centrifuges likely damaged or destroyed |
|
National Center for Vacuum Technology |
manufacture, testing, and calibration of vacuum equipment |
Fordow Enrichment Site |
unknown; was operational prior to strikes[3] |
|
National Materials Science and Engineering Research Center |
testing radioactively contaminated materials |
Fordow Enrichment Site |
unknown; was operational prior to strikes[3] |
|
Arak Heavy Water Facility |
Near Arak, Markazi Province |
damaged; struck by Israel |
|
|
Khondab Heavy Water Production Plant (HWPP) |
heavy water production (used as a moderator in nuclear reactors) |
Arak Heavy Water Facility |
damaged; distillation unit and other key buildings struck |
|
Khondab Heavy Water Research Reactor (IR-40) (20 MWt)[4] |
radioisotope production (by-products include plutonium) |
Arak Heavy Water Facility |
heavily damaged; reactor containment dome breached and core seal struck |
|
Tehran Nuclear Research Center (TNRC) |
Tehran |
limited damage; one building struck by Israel |
|
|
Tehran Research Reactor (TRR) (5 MWt) |
radioisotope production |
TNRC |
operational; undamaged |
|
Centrifuge rotor workshop |
testing and manufacture of gas centrifuge rotors |
TNRC |
damaged |
|
Jabr Ibn Hayan Multipurpose Laboratory (JHL) |
research, including on uranium metal, and the production of uranium metal disks |
TNRC |
operational; likely undamaged |
|
Molybdenum, Iodine and Xenon Radioisotope Production Facility (MIX Facility) |
radioisotope production |
TNRC |
operational; likely undamaged |
|
Waste Handling Facility |
storage and disposal of radioactive waste |
TNRC |
operational; likely undamaged |
|
Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant (NPP) |
Bushehr |
undamaged |
|
|
Bushehr-1 (Pressurized Water Reactor) (1,000 MWe) |
electricity production |
Bushehr NPP |
operational |
|
Bushehr-2 (V-528 VVER-1000 Pressurized Water Reactor) (974MWe) |
electricity production |
Bushehr NPP |
under construction |
|
Bushehr-3 (V-528 VVER-1000 Pressurized Water Reactor) (974MWe) |
electricity production |
Bushehr NPP |
under construction |
|
Karun Nuclear Power Station (Pressurized Water Reactor) (300MWe) |
electricity production |
Darkhovin |
under construction |
|
Iran-Hormuz Nuclear Power Station |
electricity production |
Sirik |
under construction |
|
Pilot Uranium Laser Enrichment Plant |
uranium enrichment using lasers |
Lashkar Abad |
likely inactive[5] |
|
Karaj Waste Storage Facility |
radioactive waste storage |
Karaj Nuclear Research Center for Medicine and Agriculture |
presumed operational |
|
Anarak Near-Surface Repository |
radioactive waste disposal |
Anarak |
operational |
Table 2: Iran’s undeclared facilities suspected of a connection to its nuclear weaponization effort
Facility/Site |
Purpose |
Location |
Status |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Turquzabad (“Location 1”) |
allegedly storage of nuclear material and equipment; location of undeclared uranium |
South of Tehran |
dismantled and sanitized by Iran |
|
Lavisan-Shian (“Location 2”) |
drilling of natural uranium to produce metal flakes; calibration of neutron detectors; location of undeclared uranium |
near Lavisan-Shian |
levelled and sanitized by Iran |
|
Varamin (“Location 3”) |
undeclared pilot-scale facility for uranium processing and conversion; location of undeclared uranium |
near Mobarakiyeh |
decommissioned; most buildings demolished by Iran |
|
Marivan (“Location 4”) |
testing of conventional explosives; explosive experiments in preparation for use of neutron detectors; location of undeclared uranium |
near Abadeh |
several buildings and bunkers demolished by Iran |
|
Parchin Military Complex |
near Parchin, Tehran Province |
struck twice by Israel in 2025; extent of damage unclear |
|
|
Taleghan 1 and 2 |
allegedly testing high explosives and a neutron initiator |
Parchin Military Complex |
Taleghan 2 destroyed by Israel in 2024; Taleghan 1 empty as of 2015 |
|
Shahid Boroujerdi underground facility |
allegedly manufacturing uranium metal components for nuclear weapons |
Parchin Military Complex |
unknown |
|
Golab Dareh |
allegedly testing explosives |
Parchin Military Complex |
unknown; construction activity observed in late 2024 |
|
Research Center for Explosion and Impact (METFAZ) Sanjarian facility |
allegedly development and testing of a shock-wave generator and other nuclear weapon subcomponents; potentially nuclear explosives modeling |
Sanjarian |
heavily damaged; struck twice by Israel in 2025 |
|
Shahid Meysami Research Center |
allegedly development of plastic explosives used for nuclear detonation testing |
near Karaj |
damaged; struck twice by Israel in 2025 |
|
Organization of Defensive Innovation and Research (SPND) headquarters |
weaponization-related research and development |
Tehran |
damaged; struck twice by Israel in 2025 |
|
SPND “Lavisan 2” campus |
weaponization-related research and development |
Tehran |
damaged; struck by Israel in 2025 |
Footnotes:
[1] Inferred from the fact that the IAEA reported no risk of off-site contamination resulting from the strikes on the ENTC. A reactor being struck would likely result in off-site contamination, as IAEA Director General Raphael Grossi explicitly stated in the context of the Tehran Research Reactor and the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant. See: “Update on Developments in Iran (3),” IAEA June 21, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran-3; “IAEA Director General's Introductory Statement to the Board of Governors,” IAEA, June 23, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-generals-introductory-statement-to-the-board-of-governors-23-june-2025; “Update on Developments in Iran (7)”, IAEA, June 27, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran-7.
[2] Israeli strikes on the Natanz uranium enrichment site on June 13, 2025, destroyed above-ground centrifuge cascades as well as electrical infrastructure including an electrical sub-station, a main electric power supply building, and emergency power supply and back-up generators. The consequent loss of power to underground centrifuge cascades likely caused the centrifuges to “have been severely damaged, if not destroyed altogether,” according to IAEA Director General Raphael Grossi in an interview with the BBC. Subsequent IAEA reporting indicated that the FEP was also struck directly by both Israel and the United States using ground-penetrating munitions. See: “Update on Developments in Iran (1),” IAEA, June 19, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-on-developments-in-iran; David Gritten, “Centrifuges at Iran's Natanz site likely destroyed, nuclear watchdog says,” BBC, June 16, 2025, available at https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cn9yll5yjx5o; “IAEA Director General Grossi’s Statement to UNSC on Situation in Iran,” IAEA, June 20, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-general-grossis-statement-to-unsc-on-situation-in-iran-20-june-2025; “IAEA Director General's Introductory Statement to the Board of Governors,” International Atomic Energy Agency, June 23, 2025, available at https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/statements/iaea-director-generals-introductory-statement-to-the-board-of-governors-23-june-2025.
[3] Both the National Vacuum Technology Center and the National Materials Science and Engineering Research Center are located at Fordow’s support site, which is up the road from the underground enrichment site that was struck by the United States. There has been no confirmation that these sites were struck by the United States or Israel. For information about their location, see: David Albright, Sarah Burkhard, Frank Pabian, and Jack Toole, “Conversion of Fordow: Another Unfulfilled Hope of the Iran Nuclear Deal,” Institute for Science and International Security, July 10, 2019, available at https://isis-online.org/isis-reports/conversion-of-fordow-another-unfulfilled-hope-of-the-iran-nuclear-deal.
[4] The original design of the IR-40 Heavy Water Research Reactor was for a power of 40 megawatts thermal (MWt); the JCPOA requires that the reactor be redesigned with a power not exceeding 20 MWt.
[5] Satellite imagery indicated activity as late as 2013 at the Pilot Uranium Laser Enrichment Plant, prompting the IAEA to visit the facility in March 2014. The JCPOA (Annex I, Section S, Paragraph 81) requires Iran to only enrich uranium using gas centrifuge technology, thereby prohibiting laser enrichment. The IAEA has made no subsequent mention of the Pilot Uranium Laser Enrichment Plant since 2014, suggesting that the facility is inactive.
